Print the page
Increase font size
Vicious Patriotism

Posted March 05, 2026

Sean Ring

By Sean Ring

Vicious Patriotism

Oscar Wilde once said, "Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious." As with most things Wilde practiced before saying aloud, it sounds outrageous until you marinate in it for a few seconds.

Old Oscar wasn't attacking the love of country. He was attacking the way patriotism gets weaponized; how it becomes the one respectable virtue available to people who've run out of better ones. As with all costless virtues, patriotism is easy to signal, but tough to practice purely. Wave the flag loudly enough, and you don't have to be honest, or courageous, or just. You just have to be loud.

Keep that in mind as we discuss Iran.

The Question Nobody Wants to Ask

The drumbeats are getting louder. The rhetoric has the familiar stench of a policy the administration decided on long ago, without enough planning, being reverse-engineered into public consent. And if you raise your hand and ask, “Has anyone thought this through?” you'll be told, with great seriousness, that this is no time for doubt. Dissent is dangerous. Real Americans™ support their commander-in-chief.

It’s the oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook, and it works every single time.

Here's the thing: questioning whether to invade Iran isn't unpatriotic. It’s that functioning kind of patriotism, the kind the Founders actually had in mind when they built a republic with checks, balances, and a citizenry expected to stay awake.

What Real Patriotism Looks Like

The signatories of the Declaration of Independence weren't blind supporters of whatever their government decided. Technically, they were traitors to the Crown. They were the people willing to risk their necks because they believed accountability mattered more than loyalty to power.

The Constitution they built afterward deliberately put war powers in the hands of Congress. They'd seen what happened when kings got to start wars unilaterally. They didn't like it.

Blind deference to executive military adventurism isn't patriotism. It's a monarchy cosplay.

A citizen who asks, “What are our objectives? What's the exit strategy? What does victory look like? And who pays for this?” isn't undermining the mission. He's performing the basic civic function that separates a republic from a rubber stamp.

The Costs Aren’t Abstract

Let's talk brass tacks for a moment, since this is a financial publication and we prefer reality to rhetoric.

Iran is not Iraq in 2003. It has a real military, real geography, real allies, and real proxies scattered across the region. A conflict with Iran doesn’t stay contained. It becomes a Gulf crisis, an oil price shock, and a decade-long commitment that makes Iraq look like a weekend camping trip.

Gold will love it, and hopefully, silver will also. Energy stocks will love it. Defense contractors who’ve been failing upward will throw a party.

Your grocery bill won’t love it. Neither will the deficit, currently running at a pace that would make Weimar Germany blush. Neither will the soldiers' families who get that dreadful knock on the door.

The patriot who cheers for war from his La-Z-Boy while someone else's kid goes to the desert isn't a patriot. He's a spectator. And spectators don't get to lecture the skeptics about love of country.

A Wilde Diagnosis

This is exactly what Wilde was diagnosing. When patriotism becomes the loudest voice in the room, it's usually because the thoughtless louts have shouted down the quiet virtues. You know… prudence, honesty, the courage to say, “I don't know if this is right.”

Jingoists don't want a debate. A debate might reveal that the emperor has no clothes, no plan, and no particular concern for the consequences. Better to preempt the conversation by questioning the questioners' loyalty.

This isn’t a partisan point. The Bush administration ran the same play in 2002. The Obama administration ran variations of it for years after Barry won the Nobel Peace Prize. Power protects itself by making doubt seem dangerous.

The difference between a citizen and a subject is that a citizen retains the right and responsibility to ask whether his government is making a catastrophic mistake.

Wrap Up

If we invade Iran and it goes well, history will vindicate the hawks and give them their due.

Fine.

But if it goes the way these things usually go, which is messy, expensive, endless, with unintended consequences and unforeseen cost increases, then the people asking hard questions now will have been the real patriots all along.

Wilde understood that the loudest flag-wavers are often the ones with the least skin in the game and the least interest in honest reckoning. He was a cynic by temperament, but he was right by observation.

Don’t Overprice Risk with Mining Companies

Don’t Overprice Risk with Mining Companies

Posted March 04, 2026

By Matt Badiali

With mining companies, perspective matters.
America First!

America First!

Posted March 03, 2026

By Sean Ring

If Israel is going to war, America goes first!
WAR! What’s It Good For?

WAR! What’s It Good For?

Posted March 02, 2026

By Sean Ring

Metals, energy, and bonds look set to profit from the Iran action.
The Biggest RINO of Them All

The Biggest RINO of Them All

Posted February 27, 2026

By Sean Ring

A new executive order threatens Americans’ privacy.
Sports, Predictions, and Morons

Sports, Predictions, and Morons

Posted February 26, 2026

By Sean Ring

The best casino trades five days a week in New York.
SOTU or STFU?

SOTU or STFU?

Posted February 25, 2026

By Sean Ring

The Donald nearly broke his arm patting himself on the back.