Print the page
Increase font size

Posted June 17, 2021

Sean Ring

By Sean Ring

If Inflation is Transitory, Why is The Fed Signaling a Rate Hike in 2023?

Its a beautiful Thursday morning here in Cebu.

A bright, golden sun shines in the clear blue sky. Gold... lets talk about that, central banking, and rates today. Jay Powells mouth has been running again.

But first, lets get young again and head back to 1996.

Greenspan For Greenhorns

Alan Greenspan was the Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987-2005. He was an adherent of Ayn Rands Objectivism philosophy and, one could say, a gold bug. That is until he discovered the fun of running the monetary policy of a fiat currency-based economy.

Taking over right before the Crash of 1987, Greenspan had to learn firefighting quickly. Then, we had the Recession of 91, which he was tasked to get us out of. Then, the Treasury Bond Debacle of 1994, mainly of his own making, had to be sorted.

But he got his feet under him, and the broader investment community largely respected him, or so we thought, by the end of 1996.

Then, on that fateful December night at the Annual Dinner and Francis Boyer Lecture of The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C.

But before I get to that, let me state something plainly.

I cant believe Im writing this, but here goes: I miss Alan Greenspan. He was the master of the indecipherable. He spoke for 3 hours straight but never actually said anything. There was literally nothing of substance in his speeches.

This was called Fedspeak or Greenspeak.

His reluctance to divulge information spawned an entire industry called Fed Watchers. All they did was write columns about what they thought Greenspan said.

They always failed. To be fair, it was an impossible task.

Why was Greenspan like this?

Well, he didnt want to rattle the markets. Over time, Greenspan learned if he was too straight with his audience - who happened to be the entire investing world - he moved the markets.

Oh, but it must have been so intoxicating for him.

Back then, people joked that the most powerful man in the world wasnt the President of the United States, Bill Clinton, but the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Just writing these words makes me miss the naivety of the 90s.

Irrational Exuberance

He mustve regretted it as soon as he said it.

But I genuinely dont think he was aware anyone was listening. Greenspan had long worried the market got frothy. Thanks to new inventions like email, productivity skyrocketed in America and elsewhere.

I had graduated from Villanova earlier in 1996. I remember sitting at my desk and emailing my old college roommate.

Can you see this?

And not 5 minutes later, up popped this new thing called a notification:


I was giddy that my old roommate and I could communicate so quickly. And we worked for different companies!


Anyway, this productivity jump, combined with low inflation, stuck a rocket up the stock market, and boy, did it fly! America was invincible. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the USA was the undisputed lone superpower globally, both militarily and economically.

In 1998, French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine called America La hyperpuissance. The Hyperpower.

What a time to be alive!

Yet, Greenspan worried.

At the AEI Dinner that night, he gave his speech. If you have insomnia, feel free to read it here.

The critical part of the speech was this passage:

Clearly, sustained low inflation implies less uncertainty about the future, and lower risk premiums imply higher prices of stocks and other earning assets. We can see that in the inverse relationship exhibited by price/earnings ratios and the rate of inflation in the past. But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions as they have in Japan over the past decade?

Oh, Alan, you silly, silly man.

I didnt watch the speech, though it was televised. I probably was watching a hockey game or a basketball game, or something else.

Funnily enough, they were watching in Japan, and the Nikkei fell 3%. Instantaneously.

So did Singapore. Later, Dubai. And then Berlin, Paris, and London.

All down roughly 3%. Like dominos.

I remember getting into work. At the time, I was in the back office of the then-Paine Webber. Like Bob Uecker in the cheap seats back office.

Everyone was in a panic.

Did you hear what Greenspan said last night?

No. What did he say?

He said the market was irrationally exuberant!


So? SO! You rookie

Of course, the Dow and the Nasdaq followed the rest of the world markets down about 3% on the open.

Yeah, but did he actually do anything?

No, there was no Fed meeting last night.

So he gave a speech, and the market tanked?



I remember thinking in my youthful naivety, Are they allowed to tank the market because of a speech?

They are, of course.

Funnily enough, had Greenspan not greenspoke all the years previously, no one wouldve given a toss.

But because he was so measured all the time, the market took it on faith that such straight talk meant Greenspan wanted to make a move on rates.

He didnt. He was just commenting.

Alan Greenspan learned never to do such a thing again!

And now, Jay Powell...

Jay Powell has nowhere near the command of the orchestra that Greenspan had.

Nor does what he said last night have enormous implications I think.

But I do wish central bankers would close their gobs on occasion. I know most disagree with me. Most want their information to flow steadily and often.

But with central bankers changing their minds like they change their underwear, I think discretion would work better now.

Powell believes that maximum employment and 2% inflation are right around the corner. So we can consider this meeting as talking about talking about tapering.

That quote is not a typo.

Because it sounds like hes about to pull the punch bowl - in late 2023(!) - the market took some money off the table.

I wouldnt mind if they were raising rates imminently, but whats the point of talking about something you probably wont do in two years from now?

I dont doubt his sincerity. I doubt his judgment about divulging his sincerity.

And I just started to think about how much easier life was back in the 1990s when Greenspeak was the lingua franca.

If you fancy a bit of a read - only 37 pages or so - about how economic depressions are caused and cured, heres an excellent ebook for you. Epub or pdf, its all there for you.

Until tomorrow!

All the best,


From Russia With Mowie Wowie

Posted August 05, 2022

By Sean Ring

Happy Friday! Grab that most excellent cup of joe and a seat. I’m going to do something I’ve never done while writing the Rude. I will attempt to write about something I don’t...

Here Comes the Reign Again

Posted August 04, 2022

By Sean Ring

I’m getting used to NYC coffee in the mornings again.  Though I must admit, I miss the blue Greek coffee cups that seem to have disappeared. Credit: My Recipes What I’m not...

Taiwan or Not Taiwan, That is the Question

Posted August 02, 2022

By Sean Ring

House Speaker Pelosi insists on visiting Taiwan. China insists she will do as she’s told. Will the 82-year-old replace Helen of Troy for future generations?

Monthly Asset Class Report

Posted July 29, 2022

By Sean Ring

Everything is up this month. Stocks, bonds, commodities, the dollar, and crypto all rallied. But is it a trend change or just another sucker’s rally?

Do Hikes Produce a “Sentiment Recession?”

Posted July 28, 2022

By Sean Ring

The Fed hiked 75 bps again. The markets rallied big yesterday. But technically, we’re still in No Man’s Land. Happy Thursday! My goodness, I need to stop partying in the Big Apple. Besides dealing with...

What is the Cantillon Effect?

Posted July 27, 2022

By Sean Ring

Happy Hump Day! Last night, I drank a few drops of something cheerful with my new Irish friend Simon, who’s training the same bankers I am. He reminded me that I haven’t...