Print the page
Increase font size

Posted September 08, 2021

Sean Ring

By Sean Ring

Entrepreneurship and Change

Its the ninth day of the ninth month. Im prepping for another two-week course and had a Zoom call with friends and colleagues.

Were doing FinTech, and one of the inevitable questions is this: Ive got many ideas, but my boss always says No. Why is that and what should I do?

Lets have a look at that through the lens of entrepreneurship.

Fun Conference Calls

Salesmen say yes to everything. Thats both a blessing and a curse.

Its a blessing as it ships the business in.

Its a curse because the actual workers, who know well the limitations of their products or services, have to deliver what the salesmen have promised.

To wit, I was on a call two days ago to prepare for an upcoming graduate course for one of the vast universal banks.

Ill paraphrase what my coordinator uttered: Your job is to get the students to be fully prepared to speak up about their ideas while giving them all the financial knowledge they get from our courses.

Luckily Im too old and wizened to make a stink. But ten years ago, I would have said, No, its HRs job to make sure they hire the right kids. And by the way, Im a trainer, not a friggin magician.

Alas, here we are.

Why Such a Request?

With the advent of fintech, crypto, and DeFi, banks are positively shitting themselves. They profited for decades - centuries, even - from the enormous, unearned privilege of receiving printed (legally counterfeit) fiat money from a central bank.

They then dole that out in the form of mortgages, loans, and other goodies for the public to pick up and be damn grateful that they did!

But bright idea people are finding other ways, and its wrecking banking profits.

Now, CEOs are positively screaming for the younkers to shout new ideas in old organizations.

Of course, their managers, whove been around for decades, are none too pleased with the idea of being out-ideated.

This is the real problem. And I dont have a wand to solve it with.

Murray Rothbard put it well in Man, Economy, and State:

The reason that firms do not scrap their old methods immediately and begin afresh is that they and their ancestors have invested in a certain structure of capital goods. As times and tastes, resources, and techniques change, much of this capital investment becomes an ex-post entrepreneurial error.

What did Rothbard mean by entrepreneurial error?

What is Entrepreneurship?

Nikolai Foss and Peter Klein wrote Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgement: A New Approach to the Firm.

In the book, they look at the various definitions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship has been defined as:

    • Small-Business Management
    • Imagination or Creativity
    • Innovation (Schumpeter)
    • Alertness to Opportunities (Kirzner)
    • The Ability to Adjust (Schultz)
    • Charismatic Leadership (Weber)
    • Judgment (Foss and Klein)

Foss and Klein settle on this: Entrepreneurship is "judgmental decision-making under conditions of uncertainty.

They further define judgment as decisive action about the deployment of economic resources when outcomes cannot be predicted according to known probabilities."

As Ive written before, entrepreneurs dont get paid to own capital. They get paid to organize it.

Organizing capital using judgmental decision-making be the most challenging job in the world.

Ludwig Lachmann wrote this in his Capital and Its Structure:

We are living in a world of unexpected change; hence capital combinations, and with them, the capital structure, will be ever-changing, will be dissolved and re-formed. In this activity, we find the real function of the entrepreneur.

Lachmann is right to point out that mixing your assets is as valid a way of creating a new structure as creating new assets.

And this is another huge issue: monolithic companies will naturally have a more challenging time adjusting to change because of their size and complexity.

This puts companies out of business, or at least causes them to miss opportunities often.

Staying nimble and listening to your customers is the key to staying relevant.

Subjective Value and Consumer Sovereignty

Two rules I always try to teach graduates in this vain are the following:

    • All value is subjective, not objective, even if it has a discrete price on it.
    • The customer/consumer is sovereign. (You must sell. They dont have to buy.)

Subjective Value

This is the most groundbreaking lesson for me. I remember sitting in an undergraduate economics class at Villanova, utterly confused.

The professor was going over his equations.

My question was this: If the things youre going to trade have equal value, why would you ever trade them? Whats the point?

Of course, those questions went unanswered.

Thats because of subjective value. Theres no such thing as objective or intrinsic value, even if its got a price on it.

Warren Buffett will pay far more for a company than other people will.

Why?

Not because hes stupid; its because the company is worth far more to him. The control premium is paid when you control the cash, as he often does.

Assessing someone elses subjective value of a good or service is a valuable skill. Walking around a medina in the Middle East is an excellent lesson in how you can do that.

Consumer Sovereignty

The consumer is the boss. Its that simple.

You, as a business owner, must sell your services.

Your prospects are under absolutely no obligation to buy from you. (If youre selling a government-mandated product, you have a captive audience - and a good grounding in coercion.)

But lets say youre selling a servicenot government-mandated.

You need to persuade, cajole, or convince another person to reach into their pockets to give you their money voluntarily.

And when theyre unhappy, you need to listen to them. Theyll tell you exactly how to fix things.

Bill Gates once said, Your most unhappy customers are your greatest source of learning.

The Entrepreneurial Process

Its the Never Ending Story. Here are the five steps, and they restart for every idea.

    1. Discovery
    2. Concept Development
    3. Resourcing
    4. Actualization
    5. Harvesting

Discovery is finding the opportunity.

Concept development is building your prototype and understanding how to manifest your idea. I think the most challenging thing in the world is bringing whats inside your head outside of it.

Resourcing is finding the financing and human capital for your venture.

Actualization is making the goods or rendering the service and running the company.

Harvesting is realizing a profit (hopefully). Then the entrepreneur must decide whether to continue investing in the firm or to sell it off.

Not surprisingly, this is hard work. But I will do my level best to inculcate my graduates with these lessons.

Hopefully, you learned a thing or two reading this today.

Have a great day.

All the best,

Sean

 

The BoJ Blinks… Or Did It?

Posted September 23, 2022

By Sean Ring

The Bank of Japan won’t be the only central bank to intervene.

Biden, Powell, and Putin Make the News All Bad

Posted September 22, 2022

By Sean Ring

A fumbling US president, a bumbling Fed chief, and a stumbling Russian president walk into a bar…

Let’s Get Nuclear! Nuclear! I Wanna Get Nuclear!

Posted September 21, 2022

By Sean Ring

Oh, not about the war, I hope. About good, clean energy domestically made.

The 10-Year Yield Roofs It

Posted September 20, 2022

By Sean Ring

At a decade high, the 10-year yield is causing all sorts of trouble.

How Movements Turn Into Rackets

Posted September 16, 2022

By Sean Ring

No matter the intentions, someone’s after the moolah

A Transitory Column

Posted September 15, 2022

By Sean Ring

The Fed can’t get the inflation toothpaste back into the tube.